Publication
Health promotion and community care: the perceptions of users, purchasers and providers of community care services
Appendix IV: Programme of discussion days
On each day participants were first given an introduction tothe research and the opportunity to ask questions.
Health promotion specialists (5 June 1996)
1. Round robin - i.e. everyone to comment:
Identify two opportunities and two obstacles to developingwork at the interface of health promotion and community care.
2. Participants divided into three groups according tointerest:
rural and islands
city
mixed
3. Feedback - structured under three questions:
3.1 The support you need in your job or department to takeforward work on health promotion and community care.
3.2 Where should limited resources be targeted in relationto health promotion and community care ?
3.3 What should be the focus of HEBS’ work and strategywith Boards and other agencies bearing in mind where you think health promotionwill be located in 2-3 years?
National voluntary organisations (6 June 1996)
1. Round robin - i.e. everyone to comment:
Identify two opportunities and two obstacles to developingwork at the interface of health promotion and community care.
2. Participants divided into three groups according tointerest:
rural and islands
city
mixed
3. Feedback - structured under three questions:
3.1 The support you need in your job or department to takeforward work on health promotion and community care.
3.2 Where should limited resources be targeted in relationto health promotion and community care ?
3.3 What should be the focus of HEBS’ work and strategywith Boards and other agencies bearing in mind where you think health promotionwill be located in 2-3 years?
Health for all participants (11 June 1996)
1. Round robin - i.e. everyone to comment:
What is your definition and experiences of Health for All?Give some examples of practice.
2. After watching a short video about a low incomecommunity which organised itself to prevent the opening of supportedaccommodation for people with mental health problems participants divided intogroups:
The issues they considered were:
- equal access to the opportunities to have a good quality of life
- inclusive communities ?
3. Feedback:
This was structured according to the following questions:
- Who should come on board ?
- How ?
Feedback session, morning of 9 September 1996
1. Round robin - i.e. everyone to comment:
One way in which I could use this report in my work is....
What I would most like to happen as a result of this reportis....
2. Participants were divided into three groups with a mixof interests/professions in each:
They were asked to consider:
What needs to happen, who might come on board and how mightwe get them on board ?
3. Feedback:
Each group was asked to provide three suggested actionsteps.